A reductionist, 'denial'-based, prohibitive philosophy is shaping what we do and don't eat.
Steven Bratman M.D. coined the term orthorexia to explain worryingly
unhealthy restrictive eating. Essentially, orthorexia is a mental
health problem experienced by a minority of individuals in our population,
characterised by a deliberate and irrational denial-based, self-punishing
relationship with food, based upon a continuously diminishing pool of foods and
drinks deemed emotionally and psychologically acceptable to the individual.
While this and other forms of mental health is cause for great concern, compassion,
care and appropriate professional assistance we are observing that a milder but
non-the-less concerning version of cultural
orthorexia is playing out in the wider population - the search for healthy
eating has become unhealthy.
Cultural orthorexia appears to have entered the general psyche; examples
- beyond the individual – abound. Now a large number of people are being
serviced by a food industry that is busy excluding; think about the latest fad,
the presumed caveman-style Paleo diets excluding dairy, cereal products and a range of processed
foods. However we can relax, as it doesn’t seem to require hunting and
gathering in the open fields or forests, fighting wild animals or each other,
and the need for a continual seasonal migration in order to survive.
Cultural orthorexia
is presenting as a reductionist, ‘denial’ and prohibitive philosophy applied to
food and the consumption of food. It is evidenced by the Western cultural trends
toward exclusion: take out the gluten, banish sugar, eliminate carbs, don’t
touch dairy, avoid all processed foods, quinoa but no other grains, a liquid-only
diet (cold-pressed juice is de rigueur), no this, no that!
While
farmers + food producers feel the heat, people are walking our cities smugly
eating in cafes - like this one in near our office in Sydney - that play to
this philosophy of denial.
This café has virtually no food, taste or appetite
cues apparent at first glance and you’d be hard pressed to even identify ‘food’
on display. Conversely, the mind is nourished with lots of stories on the wall,
‘philosophies’ of eating, and tons and tons of ingredient and nutrient based
information – food is articulated as tables, metrics, words and numbers. Although, it looks like philosophy might not
sustain or nourish one alone, but certainly helps to keep things tidy and pared
back.
One suspects
that a large degree of disassociation and control is required when one chooses
to embark on a cultural orthorexic lifestyle. But, cultural orthorexia may be
providing the sword and shield against every kind of anxiety (and there
seems to be a lot of them) we are experiencing in developed nations. It’s
probably not stretching things too far to say that there’s a degree of status
involved – exerting ‘orthorexic’ control over what we consume is a badge
proudly displayed to others. What we DON’T eat helps to set us apart rather than
what we DO eat.
The Australian
Food Pyramid was recently re-launched. It has tweaked a few things yet
still promotes balance and a bit of everything. We DO need to eat well (or is
that just a highly unfashionable perspective held by us here at Stancombe?),
and that old adage ‘everything in moderation’ looks like it may be due for a
revival.
On a final note, a recent article in The Independent struck a strong chord with us. It seems the cultural is now becoming more pathological and the debate around recognising it as a medical condition takes on a new vigour:
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/orthorexia-an-obsession-with-healthy-eating-not-yet-recognised-by-psychiatry-a6722426.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
We would be delighted to engage with you 'In Conversation'